The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of defendant's confession to an incident involving the alleged sexual molestation of his son because the purpose of the corpus delicti rule was not implicated by such an admission. Affirmed.
January 25, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Young, PICS Case No. 10-0005 (Pa. Super. Jan. 6, 2010), Ford Elliott, P.J.; Colville, J., dissenting (36 pages).
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting evidence of defendant’s confession to an incident involving the alleged sexual molestation of his son because the purpose of the corpus delicti rule was not implicated by such an admission. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Women Leaders in Consulting Awards honors the industry standouts and rising stars who are making a mark within the profession.
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the New York, NY office for a Litigation Associate with 2 to 4 years of experience. The ideal ...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a patent associate for its Intellectual Property Practice Group. Candidates should have supe...
Boutique union side labor law firm seeks an entry level attorney that can thrive in a fast paced practice that is growing at a rapid rate. E...
