The court rejected defendant's argument that the Commonwealth violated his right to a prompt trial as the court was not aware of any precedent extending the duty to prosecute a defendant in a timely manner to the collateral stages of criminal proceedings. Affirmed.
February 01, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Renchenski, PICS Case No. 10-0070 (Pa. Super. Jan. 21, 2010), Bender, J.; Cleland, J., concurring (7 pages).
The court rejected defendant’s argument that the Commonwealth violated his right to a prompt trial as the court was not aware of any precedent extending the duty to prosecute a defendant in a timely manner to the collateral stages of criminal proceedings. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
Public Finance Attorney wanted for established New Jersey bond counsel firm located in Cranford, New Jersey. New Jersey municipal and schoo...
Experienced tax attorney to assist growing corporate practice. Candidate should have a minimum of 7 years' experience in corporate and par...
University of California College of the Law, San Francisco ( UC Law SF, formerly, UC Hastings ), located in downtown San Francisco, seeks...
