A federal district judge from Maryland recently made the trenchant observation that “it makes little sense to go to all the bother and expense to get electronic information only to have it excluded from evidence” for lack of a sufficient foundation.
District Judge Paul W. Grimm, in Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co., Civil Action No. PWG-06-1893 (D. Md. May 4, 2007) Grimm, J. (101 pages), available online at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/Opinions152/Opinions/Lorraine v. Markel – ESIADMISSIBILITY OPINION.pdf, was dismissing summary judgment motions in a dispute over insurance coverage for a boat struck by lightning.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
