Now that Justice Ronald D. Castille will be taking over as chief justice of Pennsylvania, it’s worth taking a look at his dissent in a recent gaming case, Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board v. City Council of Philadelphia, PICS Case No. 07-1182 (Pa. Aug. 3, 2007) Cappy, C.J.; Castille, J. dissenting (58 pages).
His fiery dissent in that case displays a trait he’s demonstrated often in the past — a judicial acknowledgment of the real-world impact of court rulings on the public — and it shows the next chief justice might scrutinize the Pennsylvania Gaming Board more closely than his predecessor.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
