In his recent concurring opinion in a casino case, state Supreme Court Justice Ronald D. Castille — soon to be Chief Justice Castille — talked about “judicial fits and starts” with regard to the court’s handling of casino cases.
But what the justices probably haven’t fully recognized is the confusion and unease the court’s fits and starts in this area are causing among those in the legal community.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
