I.U. North America, the allocatur petitioner in Bugosh v. I.U. North America Inc., argued in its petition that this case involves “the perfect issue” to consider the application of Section 2 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts instead of Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts to the strict liability claims of the Bugosh plaintiff.‐
In the instant case, IUNA argued that the Restatement (Third) of Torts should be applied in its case in order to focus strict liability claims onto the lack of care by manufacturers, not suppliers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
