Looking back on his work as a judge, Scanlon said his greatest satisfaction came in cases where he was able to help parties reach amicable solutions without going to trial. That combined with the flaws inherrent in the jury system has made him a true believer in alternative dispute resolution.

“I did see all too often results from juries that didn’t make sense,” Scanlon said. “It’s our system of justice, but it does have its flaws. I just kept looking at this saying ‘isn’t there a better system.’”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]