There was no prejudice to defendant in allowing the commonwealth's motion to amend the information charged against defendant were the amendment raised a lesser included offense and defendant was on notice of the conduct giving rise to this new charge. Affirmance recommended.
July 20, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Hernandez-Payero, PICS Case No. 09-1133 (C.P. Berks June 2009) Schmehl, P.J. (15 pages).
There was no prejudice to defendant in allowing the commonwealth’s motion to amend the information charged against defendant were the amendment raised a lesser included offense and defendant was on notice of the conduct giving rise to this new charge. Affirmance recommended.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Atlantic City, NJ office for a litigation associate to join a fast-paced, national litigat...
Our client, a litigation services boutique, is seeking to add a Coverage & Commercial Litigation Attorney to support their rapidly growi...
Cicchiello & Cicchiello, LLP - Hartford Law Firm seeking to hire an Associate Attorney. We focus our practice primarily on Personal Inju...
