There was no prejudice to defendant in allowing the commonwealth's motion to amend the information charged against defendant were the amendment raised a lesser included offense and defendant was on notice of the conduct giving rise to this new charge. Affirmance recommended.
July 20, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Hernandez-Payero, PICS Case No. 09-1133 (C.P. Berks June 2009) Schmehl, P.J. (15 pages).
There was no prejudice to defendant in allowing the commonwealth’s motion to amend the information charged against defendant were the amendment raised a lesser included offense and defendant was on notice of the conduct giving rise to this new charge. Affirmance recommended.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
