Finding that the portion of a divorce decree holding the court did not retain jurisdiction over an alimony claim should have been vacated because there was a fatal defect on the face of the record, the Superior Court reversed the trial court's ruling.
September 07, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Bingaman v. Bingaman, PICS Case No. 08-0309 (Pa. Super. Feb. 26, 2008) Popovich, J. (21 pages).
Finding that the portion of a divorce decree holding the court did not retain jurisdiction over an alimony claim should have been vacated because there was a fatal defect on the face of the record, the Superior Court reversed the trial court’s ruling.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
