An employee was acting within the scope of his employment, and thus his claims in tort against a co-employee were barred by the Workers' Compensation Act, when he was napping in the parking lot in his car for the start of his shift. The Superior Court affirmed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to defendant.
September 28, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Kulik v. Mash, PICS Case No. 09-1577 (Pa. Super. Sept. 16, 2009) Klein, J. (8 pages).
An employee was acting within the scope of his employment, and thus his claims in tort against a co-employee were barred by the Workers’ Compensation Act, when he was napping in the parking lot in his car for the start of his shift. The Superior Court affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
Insurance defense firm located downtown Manhattan seeks an attorney with 3+ years experience to join our firm. We are a medium size insuran...
Description: Fox Rothschild LLP has an opening in the Seattle office for an associate in the Taxation & Wealth Planning Department. The ...
Description: Fox Rothschild LLP has an opening in the San Francisco, CA office for an associate in our Labor & Employment Department. Th...
