Given the strong presumption in favor of public access to judicial records, the court rejected most of the parties' requests for redaction of private financial information from post-hearing briefs and hearing transcripts. Joint motion to redact private financial information granted in part, denied in part.
October 26, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Hausfeld v. Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, PLCC, PICS Case No. 09-1753 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 14, 2009) Rice, M.J. (9 pages).
Given the strong presumption in favor of public access to judicial records, the court rejected most of the parties’ requests for redaction of private financial information from post-hearing briefs and hearing transcripts. Joint motion to redact private financial information granted in part, denied in part.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a full-time regular Judicial Secretary I, Judic...
The County is looking for a skilled and seasoned County Attorney to oversee the Law Department in delivering top-tier legal services, repres...
Position Summary: The Corporate General Counsel will manage and coordinate all legal and compliance matters affecting the company. The Gen...
