Dismissal of the instant case filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania was not warranted under the "first-filed" rule where the Pennsylvania case was not materially "on all fours" with the first-filed case in Georgia. Motions to dismiss, stay or transfer denied.
November 09, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
CertainTeed Corp. v. Nichiha USA, Inc., PICS Case No. 09-1837 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 29, 2009) Stengel, J. (14 pages).
Dismissal of the instant case filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania was not warranted under the “first-filed” rule where the Pennsylvania case was not materially “on all fours” with the first-filed case in Georgia. Motions to dismiss, stay or transfer denied.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Description:NFSA has a great opportunity for a Labor Relations Associate and Junior Counsel. This position will support NFSA's collective ba...
McCarter & English, LLP is seeking litigation attorneys for our Newark, NJ offices. Candidates must have 3-6 years of law firm experien...
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a corporate associate for its office located in Boston, MA. Candidate must have 2 - 5 years ...
