Proving a dedicated use has ceased to serve the public interest is not equivalent to showing there is no other use that might serve the public interest more. The Commonwealth Court affirmed the trial court's denial of Fox Chase Cancer Center's petition for authorization to lease real property, albeit on different grounds than the trial court.
December 28, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
In re Estate of Ryerss, PICS Case No. 09-2121 (Pa. Commw. Dec. 16, 2009) Cohn Jubelirer, J. (20 pages).
Proving a dedicated use has ceased to serve the public interest is not equivalent to showing there is no other use that might serve the public interest more. The Commonwealth Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of Fox Chase Cancer Center’s petition for authorization to lease real property, albeit on different grounds than the trial court.
Presented by BigVoodoo
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow LLP is a highly regarded legal firm based in Edison, New Jersey. The firm specializes in medical malpractice and per...
The George Washington University Law School invites applications for multiple tenure-track or tenured faculty appointments, at the rank of A...
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has an immediate opening for experienced Employment Attorneys in its Los Angeles and Ventura offices. Candida...
