Proving a dedicated use has ceased to serve the public interest is not equivalent to showing there is no other use that might serve the public interest more. The Commonwealth Court affirmed the trial court's denial of Fox Chase Cancer Center's petition for authorization to lease real property, albeit on different grounds than the trial court.
December 28, 2009 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
In re Estate of Ryerss, PICS Case No. 09-2121 (Pa. Commw. Dec. 16, 2009) Cohn Jubelirer, J. (20 pages).
Proving a dedicated use has ceased to serve the public interest is not equivalent to showing there is no other use that might serve the public interest more. The Commonwealth Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of Fox Chase Cancer Center’s petition for authorization to lease real property, albeit on different grounds than the trial court.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McManimon, Scotland & Baumann, LLC is seeking talented and motivated associate attorneys for several positions. Candidates must be admi...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a litigator with at least 2-4 years of experience in all aspects of commercial litigation (i.e., depositions and ...
A prestigious matrimonial law firm in Garden City is seeking a skilled Associate Attorney with 5 to 7 years of experience in family law. The...
