The Commonwealth Court concluded that the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) improperly redacted the identities of the recipients of the goods and services PEMA purchased with federal grant money, and reversed and remanded to the Office of Open Records with instructions for further remand to PEMA.
February 22, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Bowling v. Office of Open Records, PICS Case No. 10-1194 (Pa. Commw. Feb. 5, 2010) Simpson, J. (26 pages).
The Commonwealth Court concluded that the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA) improperly redacted the identities of the recipients of the goods and services PEMA purchased with federal grant money, and reversed and remanded to the Office of Open Records with instructions for further remand to PEMA.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join General Counsel and Senior Legal Leaders at the Premier Forum Designed For and by General Counsel from Fortune 1000 Companies
Women, Influence & Power in Law Awards honors women lawyers who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession.
WIPL is the original global forum facilitating women-to-women exchange on leadership and legal issues.
NY defense counsel seeking experienced no fault attorney responsible for cases from inception to resolution, including court and arb appeara...
NY auto defense firm seeks experienced TRIAL ATTORNEY to do trials, motions, court appearances and depositions. Salary range 100K-130K depen...
Shipman is seeking an associate to join our Employee Benefits practice. Candidates should have one to two years of employee benefits experie...
