The trial court did not err in refusing to grant a mistrial based on alleged prosecutorial misconduct where the district attorney's comments during closing argument constituted "permissible oratorical flair" when viewed in the context of defense counsel's contention that the victim was not believable. Affirmed.
March 23, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Ragland, PICS Case No. 10-1447 (Pa. Super. March 9, 2010) Stevens, J. (8 pages).
The trial court did not err in refusing to grant a mistrial based on alleged prosecutorial misconduct where the district attorney’s comments during closing argument constituted “permissible oratorical flair” when viewed in the context of defense counsel’s contention that the victim was not believable. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
COLE SCHOTZ P.C.COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE PARALEGAL- NEW YORK OR NEW JERSEY OFFICES: Prominent mid-Atlantic law firm with multiple regional of...
Our client, a small but highly sophisticated and entrepreneurial tax boutique in Charleston, SC, has asked for our firm s assistance in iden...
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
