When the state Supreme Court affirmed earlier this year a Superior Court ruling that attorney-client privilege only applies to information given to the attorney by the client, not the other way around, only four justices participated and they were split down the middle.
The per curiam decision in Nationwide v. Fleming left only the Superior Court opinion plus some opposing guidance from the justices on where this area of law stood.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
