At the end of an April press conference called by Gov. Edward G. Rendell to discuss why Pennsylvania’s legislators should join the movement to abandon the practice of electing appellate judges, there sat together a collection of words and phrases long used by those championing a change to an appointive process.
“Appearance of impropriety,” “crisis of confidence,” “special interests.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
