The court concluded that third-party Espada had actual authority to consent to the seizure of defendant's jacket and suitcase in Espada's bedroom, and that her consent was voluntary.
May 25, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
U.S.A. v. Cruz, PICS Case No. 10-1764 (E.D. Pa. April 23, 2010) Sanchez, J. (10 pages).
The court concluded that third-party Espada had actual authority to consent to the seizure of defendant’s jacket and suitcase in Espada’s bedroom, and that her consent was voluntary. Accordingly, the police were permitted to seize defendant’s items, and his motion to suppress was denied.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
