A deal to develop a family court building in Philadelphia and one to sell off land to a developer in Haverford Township highlight how alternative fee arrangements don’t always pay off — in money or public perception.
But those in the legal community say the larger issues surrounding particularly the family court deal, in which an attorney represented the judiciary and had a deal with the developer, are the potential conflicts of interest and challenges of an attorney who both advises clients and has a related business on the side.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
