Specific paragraphs in the court of common pleas' General Court Regulation 2009-1 were invalid because they went beyond the requirements of the Abandoned and Blighted Property Conservatorship Act and deprived a petitioner of a hearing for failure to provide more than a sworn statement that certain criteria were met. Affirmed.
June 01, 2010 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
In re Conservatorship Proceeding, PICS Case No. 10-1792 (Pa. Commw. April 30, 2010) McGinley, J. (26 pages).
Specific paragraphs in the court of common pleas’ General Court Regulation 2009-1 were invalid because they went beyond the requirements of the Abandoned and Blighted Property Conservatorship Act and deprived a petitioner of a hearing for failure to provide more than a sworn statement that certain criteria were met. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Mineola defense firm seeks attorneys with 3-5 years of actual insurance defense experience to handle complex general liability matters. Sala...
Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, NJ is seeking an Experienced Commercial Real Estate/Transactional Attorney for a full-time position. ...
Boutique Law Firm in Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey is seeking a Litigation Associate NJ Bar admission required. NY admission a plus but is no...
