As lawyers, we know that we have a duty to zealously represent our clients within the bounds of the law. As our thoughts turn to the American ideals of liberty and freedom that we celebrate on the Fourth of July, we want to discuss a new threat to the ability of one particular group of lawyers to fulfill that duty.
If adopted, a controversial provision buried within the 1030-page H.R. 5136, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 2011, or NDAA, would expose lawyers who represent detainees held at the Naval Station in Guantanamo Bay to an unprecedented level of government oversight and investigation by the Department of Defense (DOD). The provision’s sponsor, Florida Republican Rep. Jeff Miller, argues that the national security implications of the Guantanamo attorneys’ work justify this heightened scrutiny. Numerous legal organizations have condemned this encroachment on attorneys’ freedom to zealously represent clients, a backbone of the freedoms we hold so dear.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
