Appellants who fail to respond to a direct order from the Superior Court requiring a concise statement of matters complained of on appeal will have their claims considered waived, a panel of that court has ruled.
Judge John T. Bender wrote for a unanimous panel in J.M.R. v. J.M. that the decision extends the rationale that such claims should be waived when appellants fail to respond to similar orders from trial courts. That decision, also authored by Bender, was reached earlier this year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
