The master did not err in finding that certain stock units were husband's separate property and not marital property where husband did not have the right to access the stock units prior to the parties' divorce. Exceptions ruled upon.
August 24, 2010 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Carnahan v. Carnahan, PICS Case No. 10-2646 (C.P. Lawrence July 2010) Hodge, J. (11 pages).
The master did not err in finding that certain stock units were husband’s separate property and not marital property where husband did not have the right to access the stock units prior to the parties’ divorce. Exceptions ruled upon.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
AMENDED NOTICE OF BANKRUPTCY JUDGE VACANCIES DISTRICT OF UTAH The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit seeks applicati...
The New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) is seeking an experienced and visionary leader to serve as its next Executive Directo...
We are a boutique firm specializing the area of real estate law and handling both litigation and transactional matters. We are seeking an as...
