Defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's negligence claim based on her fall on defendant's icy parking lot should be denied because reasonable minds could disagree as to whether plaintiff had a reasonable alternative to patronizing the store or crossing the parking lot to help another injured patron.
August 24, 2010 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Cater v. Starbucks Corp., PICS Case No. 10-2689 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 10, 2010) Pollak, J. (9 pages).
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s negligence claim based on her fall on defendant’s icy parking lot should be denied because reasonable minds could disagree as to whether plaintiff had a reasonable alternative to patronizing the store or crossing the parking lot to help another injured patron. Motion for summary judgment denied.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The National Law Journal Elite Trial Lawyers recognizes U.S.-based law firms performing exemplary work on behalf of plaintiffs.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
General Counsel Summit is the premier event for in-house counsel, hosting esteemed legal minds from all sectors of the economy.
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. TRUSTS & ESTATES ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: NEW JERSEY OR NEW YORK OFFICES: Prominent mid-Atlantic la...
Post & Schell's Casualty Litigation Department is currently seeking an attorney with 2- 4 years of litigation experience, preferably in ...
A client focused Atlanta Personal Injury Law Firm is seeking an experienced, highly motivated, and enthusiastic personal injury attorney who...
