Plaintiffs' motion for class certification was denied under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3) for failure to show antitrust impact was capable of proof at trial through evidence that was common to the class.
September 14, 2010 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
In re Plastics Additives Antitrust Litigation, PICS Case No. 10-3054 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 31, 2010) Davis, J. (42 pages).
Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification was denied under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(b)(3) for failure to show antitrust impact was capable of proof at trial through evidence that was common to the class.
Presented by BigVoodoo
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow LLP is a highly regarded legal firm based in Edison, New Jersey. The firm specializes in medical malpractice and per...
The George Washington University Law School invites applications for multiple tenure-track or tenured faculty appointments, at the rank of A...
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has an immediate opening for experienced Employment Attorneys in its Los Angeles and Ventura offices. Candida...
