D.Y. appealed from an order adjudicating him delinquent for, inter alia, burglary. The Superior Court held that where fingerprint testimony was the only evidence linking D.Y. with the crime and where the "ten print card" was not admitted as evidence and no witness testified that the prints on the card belonged to D.Y., the adjudication could not stand. Reversed.
September 21, 2010 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
In re D.Y., PICS Case No. 10-3103 (Pa. Super. Sept. 9, 2010) Lazarus, J.; Allen, J., dissenting (11 pages).
D.Y. appealed from an order adjudicating him delinquent for, inter alia, burglary. The Superior Court held that where fingerprint testimony was the only evidence linking D.Y. with the crime and where the “ten print card” was not admitted as evidence and no witness testified that the prints on the card belonged to D.Y., the adjudication could not stand. Reversed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
