The Supreme Court held that the commonwealth may not rely on statutory and administrative approvals of pre-arrest breath testing devices pursuant to §1547 of the Vehicle Code to justify the admission of test results into evidence in prosecutions under the Crimes Code. Affirmed.
November 02, 2010 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Brigidi, PICS Case No. 10-3383 (Pa. Oct. 19, 2010) Saylor, J. (12 pages).
The Supreme Court held that the commonwealth may not rely on statutory and administrative approvals of pre-arrest breath testing devices pursuant to §1547 of the Vehicle Code to justify the admission of test results into evidence in prosecutions under the Crimes Code. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow LLP is a highly regarded legal firm based in Edison, New Jersey. The firm specializes in medical malpractice and per...
The George Washington University Law School invites applications for multiple tenure-track or tenured faculty appointments, at the rank of A...
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has an immediate opening for experienced Employment Attorneys in its Los Angeles and Ventura offices. Candida...
