Papers filed in the just settled fee fight between POM Wonderful and Hogan Lovells show that the juice maker’s legal team struggled to keep its facts straight throughout the seven-month-long litigation.
Affidavits filed in District of Columbia Superior Court explain how POM’s lawyers publicly disclosed the existence of a Federal Trade Commission probe of the company’s advertising materials in a California case while at the same time telling a D.C. judge the investigation needed to remain a secret — going so far as to sue to prevent The National Law Journal from publishing the name of the federal agency.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
