Much has been written, and even more has been discussed in noisy courthouse corridors, about the Medicare Secondary Payer Act (MSPA), as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, and its impact on the personal injury bar.
Do the reporting requirements of the Extension Act, which are being implemented on Jan. 1, 2011, portend the imposition of “big government” into the litigation process, or are these requirements merely a tempest in a teapot that will blow over resulting in “business as usual?”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]