Just after the Supreme Court’s controversial campaign finance blockbuster Citizens United v. FEC, critics and supporters of the decision predicted the high court would weigh in next on state laws providing public funding to candidates.
On Monday, the justices proved them right, re-entering the fray with their decision to determine the constitutionality of an Arizona law that provides matching funds to publicly financed candidates.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
