Expert testimony was required to establish the standard of care and the breach of that standard because plaintiff's claims of legal malpractice were beyond the ordinary knowledge or experience of a layperson.
December 07, 2010 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Frost v. Fox Rothschild, LLP, PICS Case No. 10-3543 (C.P. Philadelphia Nov. 12, 2010) Lachman, J. (16 pages).
Expert testimony was required to establish the standard of care and the breach of that standard because plaintiff’s claims of legal malpractice were beyond the ordinary knowledge or experience of a layperson.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
ABOUT USThe Federal Public Defender for the District of Connecticut is a law office that provides legal representation to persons charged wi...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Chicago, IL office for a Labor & Employment Associate with three to five years of expe...
We are seeking an attorney with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowne...
