The state Supreme Court has granted an appeal in an asbestos case that asks the question of whether experts can assume a little exposure to the carcinogen is the same as a lot of exposure.
The high court in Betz v. Pneumo Abex granted appeal limited to the issue of whether the Superior Court erred when it reversed the trial court’s decision to exclude the testimony of the plaintiffs’ experts in a case involving friction-based products like those found in the automotive industry.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
