The commonwealth did not violate defendant's right to a speedy trial where the case against him was placed on the court's trial term 17 months after he was arraigned, where the delay was caused by disposition of several pre-trial motions filed by defendant. Motion to dismiss denied.
December 28, 2010 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Checo, PICS Case No. 10-3608 (C.P. Monroe Oct. 20, 2010) Sibium, J. (9 pages).
The commonwealth did not violate defendant’s right to a speedy trial where the case against him was placed on the court’s trial term 17 months after he was arraigned, where the delay was caused by disposition of several pre-trial motions filed by defendant. Motion to dismiss denied.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers and financiers for the real estate healthcare event of the year!
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
Prominent law firm seeks 2 associates to join our defense teams in our downtown New York City and Melville, NY offices.The Litigation Associ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening for a Litigation Counsel in our Seattle office. Experience with insurance bad faith and coverage ...
