Provisions of Megan's Law II were inapplicable to appellant. The term "imprisonment" was intended to apply only to the original term of confinement served pursuant to a conviction for a Megan's Law sex offense. The term did not apply to appellant as his imprisonment resulted from a probation violation on an unrelated offense.
December 28, 2010 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Rivera, PICS Case No. 10-3680 (Pa. Super. Dec. 17, 2010) Lazarus, J. (16 pages).
Provisions of Megan’s Law II were inapplicable to appellant. The term “imprisonment” was intended to apply only to the original term of confinement served pursuant to a conviction for a Megan’s Law sex offense. The term did not apply to appellant as his imprisonment resulted from a probation violation on an unrelated offense.
Presented by BigVoodoo
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow LLP is a highly regarded legal firm based in Edison, New Jersey. The firm specializes in medical malpractice and per...
The George Washington University Law School invites applications for multiple tenure-track or tenured faculty appointments, at the rank of A...
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has an immediate opening for experienced Employment Attorneys in its Los Angeles and Ventura offices. Candida...
