When New York state supreme court justice Richard Lowe III in November affirmed a $13 million fee award for Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan against its onetime clients, Facebook Inc. rivals Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, the firm’s litigator-in-chief John Quinn couldn’t help but brag via his Twitter account: “Winklevoss twins lose again: QE payday cometh.”

Um, not quite yet. Four days before Christmas, San Jose federal district court judge James Ware ruled that the $13 million must remain in an escrow account while the Winklevoss twins appeal the New York decision. And meanwhile, according to an exhibit filed with Judge Ware, John Quinn has faced questioning by Judge Lowe, who wanted to know why Quinn referred to the fee ruling on Twitter–even though it was sealed.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]