There were material questions of fact regarding whether plaintiff made himself a limited-purpose public figure by virtue of his association with one or more targets of a criminal investigation who were ultimately charged. Defendants' motion for summary judgment denied.
January 11, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Joseph v. Scranton Times, L.P., PICS Case No. 10-3672 (C.P. Luzerne Dec. 13, 2010) Van Jura, J. (33 pages).
There were material questions of fact regarding whether plaintiff made himself a limited-purpose public figure by virtue of his association with one or more targets of a criminal investigation who were ultimately charged. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on how individuals and firms are changing the investment advisory industry where it matters most.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
McCarter & English, LLP is actively seeking a litigation associate for its office located in Hartford, CT. One to three years of experie...
Borteck & Czapek, P.C., based in Florham Park, is a boutique estates and trusts law firm specializing in estate planning and administrat...
Gwinnett County State Court is seeking an attorney to assist the Judge by conducting a variety of legal research, analysis, and document pre...
