Attorneys following the post- Koken landscape of Pennsylvania’s insurance law have been waiting some time for an appellate panel to weigh in on how trial courts should handle tort and UIM claims stemming from the same automobile accident.
The Superior Court’s recent decision in Richner v. McCance may not provide a definitive answer, but practitioners are likely to study the three-judge panel’s ruling in the case for any indication of how to proceed on the issue of consolidation versus severance, attorneys say.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
