A trial court abused its discretion when it imposed the “harsh sanction” of disqualifying a lawyer in a divorce proceeding for failing to promptly inform opposing counsel about attorney-client privileged documents her client obtained from her husband’s e-mail account, a state appeals panel has ruled.
The Appellate Division, Third Department, said it did not condone Melody Ann MacKenzie’s failure to inform opposing counsel that she had obtained e-mails between the husband, Steven M. Parnes, and Paul Van Ryn, a lawyer who had previously represented both Parneses in unrelated proceedings. The court also did not condone Ms. MacKenzie’s tactic of “surprising” Mr. Parnes at his deposition by questioning him about the privileged communications.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
