The theory that the corporate veil can be pierced if two corporations share common ownership and operate as a single enterprise is not recognized in Pennsylvania and can’t sustain an excavating business’ claims against a construction project owner unless they have a contract, a Lackawanna County Common Pleas judge ruled this month.
A construction subcontractor is alleging that he is owed more than $850,000 for four construction projects by a general contractor, Judge Terrence R. Nealon wrote in Sparrow v. PACE/CM Inc.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
