The Public Utility commission did not err in granting a joint application. Substantial evidence supported the PUC's determination that the merger would provide a public benefit and would be a positive factor in the competitive market. Affirmed.
March 15, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Lloyd v. Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm’n, PICS Case No. 11-0373 (Pa. Commw. March 12, 2011) Brobson, J. (17 pages).
The Public Utility commission did not err in granting a joint application. Substantial evidence supported the PUC’s determination that the merger would provide a public benefit and would be a positive factor in the competitive market. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
McCarter & English is actively seeking a 5th-6th year trademark associate who has trademark prosecution, licensing and litigation experi...
**PLEASE READ THE COMPLETE AD BEFORE APPLYING***Established 25-year boutique Plaintiff's Personal Injury Law Firm in the Dadeland area seeki...
Our client, a multi-state full-service boutique, is seeking to add a senior construction litigation associate to their Florida team. Qualif...
