Upon Further Review
On an e-mail discussion list for professors of constitutional law that I subscribe to, someone recently raised the topic of who would qualify as the greatest U.S. Supreme Court advocates of all time. That discussion soon gave rise to an important subsidiary question: What constitutes greatness in appellate advocacy? In response to that question, someone on the discussion list responded facetiously that the advocate who achieved the greatest number of victories not justified by governing law and the facts of the case should be regarded as the greatest appellate advocate.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
