Illinois residents who alleged that brain cancer and tumors were caused by exposure to a toxic chemical have asked for the recusal of the Philadelphia judge who threw their case out of court.
The counsel for Joanne Branham, who sued Rohm & Haas, now owned by chemical giant Dow, over her husband Franklin Delano Branham’s death from brain cancer, said in a recent motion that Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Allan L. Tereshko’s actions in Branham v. Rohm & Haas showed the “court’s suspectibility to strong emotion and the court’s inability to act in control of those emotions to assure the fair adjudications of these important proceedings.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
