The district court did not err in finding that defendants engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination when they refused to accept and post ads offered by plaintiffs and intended to inform ex-prisoners of their voting rights. Affirmed.
August 23, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Pittsburgh League of Young Voters Education Fund v. Port Authority of Allegheny Cnty., PICS Case No. 11-3862 (3d Cir. Aug. 5, 2011) Smith, J. (18 pages).
The district court did not err in finding that defendants engaged in unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination when they refused to accept and post ads offered by plaintiffs and intended to inform ex-prisoners of their voting rights. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Consulting Magazine identifies the best firms to work for in the consulting profession.
RECRUITMENT BONUS Newly hired employees from this recruitment may be eligible to receive bonus payments up to $3,000!* FLEXIBLE SCHEDULE: ...
Morristown, NJ; New York, NY Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in multiple offices for a Counsel in our Litigation Department. The ...
The Forest Preserves of Cook CountyIs seeking applicants forDeputy Chief Attorney The Forest Preserves of Cook County is seeking a detail-o...
