The grill of a vehicle did not fall within the definition of "moveable property" and was not taken "from the motor vehicle"; accordingly, the court found no error in the trial court's grant of acquittal. Affirmed.
September 20, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Foster, PICS Case No. 11-4032 (Pa. Super. Sept. 1, 2011) Ford Elliott, P.J.E. (11 pages).
The grill of a vehicle did not fall within the definition of “moveable property” and was not taken “from the motor vehicle”; accordingly, the court found no error in the trial court’s grant of acquittal. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Company DescriptionA prominent boutique AV rated Education Law firm located in Westbury, New York. Our firm specializes in education law, sp...
Seeking motivated and skilled litigation attorney to join our dynamic defense litigation firm. Role Involves:Conducting thorough research.Ha...
DEPUTY PORT ATTORNEY III Oakland, CA Salary: $17,294 - $21,419/month, 37.5-hr work week Your Port. Your Community. Your Career. Whe...
