The state Supreme Court has unanimously decided that a man convicted of mass murder nearly 30 years ago was mentally unfit to be put to death because he lacked a "rational understanding" of the death penalty or its reasons for application.
October 11, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
The state Supreme Court has unanimously decided that a man convicted of mass murder nearly 30 years ago was mentally unfit to be put to death because he lacked a “rational understanding” of the death penalty or its reasons for application.
The decision — which the court said had been delayed by a lengthy procedural history — provides guidance regarding competency evaluations of people on death row.
Presented by BigVoodoo
This event shines a spotlight on the individuals, teams, projects and organizations that are changing the financial industry.
BTI provides leading tax professionals from financial institutions with unmatched tools and resources.
Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS:(1) Tasks and responsibilities include:Reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements for internal business...
Boutique midtown Manhattan law firm specializing in sophisticated real estate litigation & representation of commercial and residential ...
Description: Fox Rothschild has an opening in the Boston, MA office for a Litigation Associate with 3 to 5 years of experience. The ideal ca...
