A man who used his father’s car for “work” and “emergencies” did not use the car “regularly” enough to preclude him from collecting underinsured motorist benefits by way of his mother’s insurance policy, a Luzerne County judge has ruled.
Common Pleas Court Judge Joseph M. Cosgrove had previously denied summary judgment to the Erie Insurance Exchange, which sought to block the claim under its “regular use” exclusion. After attorneys filed a subsequent round of motions, Cosgrove granted summary judgment last month to plaintiffs Patrick Rother and his mother, Daryl Rother.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
