The "regular use" exclusion contained in a personal automobile insurance policy precluded payment of underinsured motorist benefits to a police officer injured in the course of employment while operating a police vehicle for which the officer did not have the ability to obtain UIM coverage. Affirmed.
November 01, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Williams v. GEICO Government Employees Ins. Co., PICS Case No. 11-4355 (Pa. Oct. 19, 2011) Orie Melvin, J.; Saylor, J., concurring; Baer, J., concurring; Todd, J., concurring (34 pages).
The “regular use” exclusion contained in a personal automobile insurance policy precluded payment of underinsured motorist benefits to a police officer injured in the course of employment while operating a police vehicle for which the officer did not have the ability to obtain UIM coverage. Affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
Javerbaum Wurgaft, a large civil litigation firm with nine (9) offices, seeks: Plaintiff Personal Injury Attorney for Northern New Jersey of...
Mid sized NYC Personal Injury Defense Firm seeking to immediately hire several attorneys to join our firm. Preferred candidates are those w...
Mid-size Parsippany based law firm with a statewide practice is searching for a full-time motivated associate litigation attorney with 3-5 y...
