Sexually violent predator (SVP) assessments conducted after sentencing were proper and the evidence was sufficient to support appellant's SVP designation. Order designating appellant a sexually violent predator affirmed.
November 01, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Commonwealth v. Whanger, PICS Case No. 11-4356 (Pa. Super. Oct. 20, 2011) Colville, J.; Bowes, J., concurring; Lazarus, J., dissenting (23 pages.
Sexually violent predator (SVP) assessments conducted after sentencing were proper and the evidence was sufficient to support appellant’s SVP designation. Order designating appellant a sexually violent predator affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law.com celebrates the California law firms and legal departments driving the state's dynamic legal landscape.
The Texas Lawyer honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in Texas.
CORE RESPONSIBILITIES AND TASKS: Reporting to the Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer &...
Yale New Haven Health seeks a dynamic and collaborative executive to serve as its Vice President, Labor Strategy and Senior Associate Genera...
Nestled in the heart of Northern California Wine Country, Sonoma County is the largest county in the North Bay region of the San Francisco B...
