In this zoning appeal, mandamus was not appropriate because there was no clear right to relief and an adequate legal remedy existed. The trial court's order granting in part and denying in part appellant's complaint in mandamus and request for peremptory judgment was affirmed.
November 08, 2011 at 10:00 AM
1 minute read
Orange Stones v. City of Reading Zoning Hearing Bd., PICS Case No. 11-4397 (Pa. Commw. Oct. 28, 2011) McCullough, J. (8 pages).
In this zoning appeal, mandamus was not appropriate because there was no clear right to relief and an adequate legal remedy existed. The trial court’s order granting in part and denying in part appellant’s complaint in mandamus and request for peremptory judgment was affirmed.
Presented by BigVoodoo
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Eichen Crutchlow Zaslow LLP is a highly regarded legal firm based in Edison, New Jersey. The firm specializes in medical malpractice and per...
The George Washington University Law School invites applications for multiple tenure-track or tenured faculty appointments, at the rank of A...
Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani has an immediate opening for experienced Employment Attorneys in its Los Angeles and Ventura offices. Candida...
