A grand jury report criticizing the manner in which the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board issued licenses to operate gaming facilities in the state came out back in May, but the litigation over whether the board had attorney-client privilege protection during that investigation has continued — until now.
The state Supreme Court has denied the board’s request for review of a lower court ruling that found the board, as a state agency, had no expectation of attorney-client privilege when being investigated by the Attorney General’s Office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
